To get to the constrained Pareto e
fficient outcome, the social planner would have to tax away
pure pro
fits to subsidize wages until w∗ = F (L)
L
. But:
•
The social planner’s solution will be more socially efficient but will not generate a Pareto
improvement.
•
Taxation will make firms strictly worse off and workers better off.
•
Unless workers and firms are the same people, this welfare improvement requires redistribution.
•
Hence, this model suggests a violation of the Second Welfare Theorem: efficiency and
distribution are
not separable problems in this economy.
1.12 Summary
This
No comments:
Post a Comment