Therefore
the only thing we can do today to alleviate the future crisis is try to ensure that there will be more goods available in the future.
OK,
what determines the future availability of goods?
Three things:
the amount of work young people do in the future,
the amount of work old people do in the future,
and
the quality and quantity of the stuff (machines, factories, raw materials, etc.)
that we leave for them to work with.
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Saturday, September 8, 2012
I promised these people
Yip
Got hammered over the carpenters "yawn gyper" weekend
No timely post inaugurality
Let me up date the C struggle
Unions in pub sec still under all court press press
Teachers in Czech-Kay-go hob sons choice
taking a bi partisn hemlock proffering
Or a vicious media blitz klieg
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
been puttin on the ritz for eve
She arrived three hours ago and just left ....in a damn big hurry ...
ahhhh well ...she'll be back ....maybe
------------------------------------------
in this snap from 1998
eve's just read my mind
ahhhh well ...she'll be back ....maybe
------------------------------------------
in this snap from 1998
eve's just read my mind
viva state min
eve on her way out added this
--------------------------------------------------------
at long last contraction of the pub sec during a recovery


don't look at that top line citizens !
that world is gone
but do note this
the private sector this time despite the public anchor
has bounced back
on a par with the younger bush recovery
and not so horribly worse then it recovered under old bush and clinton
keeping pace with our other two
"new era " recoveries
the legacy of a "keeper"
--------------------------------------------------------
at long last contraction of the pub sec during a recovery

don't look at that top line citizens !
that world is gone
but do note this
the private sector this time despite the public anchor
has bounced back
on a par with the younger bush recovery
and not so horribly worse then it recovered under old bush and clinton
keeping pace with our other two
"new era " recoveries
the legacy of a "keeper"
show me how steve landsberg boosts inequality
guest post by eve abel
-----------------------------------------------
read this first :
"there is probably very little we can do right now in terms of deciding who gets what in the year 2030.
That's because any decisions we make are subject to reversal through the political process
. In 2030, old people either will or will not have the political clout to claim a bigger share of the pie. If they have that clout, they'll use it, and if not, not. And they won't be bound by anything we decided to do back in 2012.
There's not much we can do about dictating the work habits of people in 2020. They'll choose their own work habits, and they'll pass their own laws to try to influence each others' work habits.
the only thing we can do now to address the underlying crisis then
is to encourage saving,
because saving means investment,
and investment means that when 2030 comes around
we and our descendants will have more and better machines and factories to produce more and better food and aspirin and television sets."
brief version
more saving today means more and better machines and factories tomorrow
question
true or untrue ?
if you answer true
then
you just put yourself
on the road to trickle down gultch
when you figure out why that is the case
come back here and worship my graven image
-- my graven image btw is under construction now even as i tap this out --
hint
marginal propensity to save out of income
as a function of rising income
saving is a morbid cottage industry
it has no necessary place in a modern pure credit economy
we all should spend as we earn
letting the transfer system pre empt what fraction
now only prudence sets aside
and for God's sake
this is far worse then wrong
" beware! The time for all this is not yet..."
that's johnny keynes and when he wrote it
the nasty little hortation was already hopelessly wrong headed
okay take the rest in pikers:
".. For at least another hundred years we must pretend to ourselves and to everyone that fair is foul and foul is fair; for foul is useful and fair is not."
good grief !!
" Avarice accuulation and usury must be our gods
for a little longer still. "
"For only they can lead us out of the tunnel of economic necessity into daylight."
and to boot
did this master of essay prose
ever write a more ham footed passage ?
i love ya john you old poof
but you were frightfully conservative
-----------------------------------------------
read this first :
"there is probably very little we can do right now in terms of deciding who gets what in the year 2030.
That's because any decisions we make are subject to reversal through the political process
. In 2030, old people either will or will not have the political clout to claim a bigger share of the pie. If they have that clout, they'll use it, and if not, not. And they won't be bound by anything we decided to do back in 2012.
There's not much we can do about dictating the work habits of people in 2020. They'll choose their own work habits, and they'll pass their own laws to try to influence each others' work habits.
the only thing we can do now to address the underlying crisis then
is to encourage saving,
because saving means investment,
and investment means that when 2030 comes around
we and our descendants will have more and better machines and factories to produce more and better food and aspirin and television sets."
brief version
more saving today means more and better machines and factories tomorrow
question
true or untrue ?
if you answer true
then
you just put yourself
on the road to trickle down gultch
when you figure out why that is the case
come back here and worship my graven image
-- my graven image btw is under construction now even as i tap this out --
hint
marginal propensity to save out of income
as a function of rising income
saving is a morbid cottage industry
it has no necessary place in a modern pure credit economy
we all should spend as we earn
letting the transfer system pre empt what fraction
now only prudence sets aside
and for God's sake
this is far worse then wrong
" beware! The time for all this is not yet..."
that's johnny keynes and when he wrote it
the nasty little hortation was already hopelessly wrong headed
okay take the rest in pikers:
".. For at least another hundred years we must pretend to ourselves and to everyone that fair is foul and foul is fair; for foul is useful and fair is not."
good grief !!
" Avarice accuulation and usury must be our gods
for a little longer still. "
"For only they can lead us out of the tunnel of economic necessity into daylight."
and to boot
did this master of essay prose
ever write a more ham footed passage ?
i love ya john you old poof
but you were frightfully conservative
youthful prospects alert
"The share of American 18- to 24-year-olds who were employed
fell to 54 per cent last year,
the lowest since the labor department began tracking data in 1948"
they may follow a nasty euro trend
and fall further into the tender clutches of mr " try more higher ed "
fell to 54 per cent last year,
the lowest since the labor department began tracking data in 1948"
they may follow a nasty euro trend
and fall further into the tender clutches of mr " try more higher ed "
is thw wage stag all about a huge influx of non whites and females ? .no !
white male share of total employment
lame kenworthy asserts:
"A compositional shift in employment isn’t what distinguishes the era of wage stagnation from the earlier period of rising wages"
he notes the steady decline in white male share ...no evidence of an acceleration
in the WM share since the post war up trendin median wages breaks in the early 70's
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)